 |
| Nine justices take their place inside the Constitutional Court in central Seoul, Dec. 27, 2019. The court ruled Thursday that a law calling for aggregated punishment against repeat drunk driving offenses or refusing field sobriety testing was unconstitutional. / Yonhap |
The Constitutional Court ruled Thursday that a law calling for aggregated punishment against repeated offenses of drunk driving or refusing field sobriety testing is unconstitutional.
The nine-justice panel made the ruling in a 7-2 vote to a clause of the country's revised Road Traffic Act, dubbed the Yoon Chang-ho act, named after a high-profile DUI case. A vote of two-thirds is required to reverse a ruling.
The controversial law, revised in 2020, has lost its validity following the ruling.
The clause states that those committing DUIs or refusing to take a breathalyzer test on two or more occasions should be put behind bars for between two and five years or fined 10 million won to 20 million won ($7,896-$15,792).
The court ruled that aggregated punishment for multiple violations was excessive, saying it was too much to label a person a repeat drunk driving offender when there was a considerable interval between the two offenses.
Last year, the Constitutional Court made a similar ruling and delivered a non-constitutional decision against another clause of the Road Traffic Act. (Yonhap)
![[INTERVIEW] 'Money Heist: Korea' writer feels satisfied to expand series' franchise](https://img.koreatimes.co.kr/upload/thumbnailV2/e264f8d5589442489d72f9494ca3f1c7.jpg/dims/resize/178/optimize)
